§

Valley Gold Dairies, Inc.

152 N.L.R.B. 1470 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Valley Gold Dairies, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Buitoni Foods Corp.

    298 F.2d 169 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times

    No. 13534. Argued October 3, 1961. Decided January 15, 1962. Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Joseph S. Oberwager, Newark, N.J., for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit Judge. This is a proceeding under Section 10(e) of the Labor Management

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Montgomery Ward Co., 157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946), the employees remained on their job but refused to handle any clerical work originating from another of the employer's plants which was on strike.

  5. Bituminous Material Supply Co. v. N.L.R.B

    281 F.2d 365 (8th Cir. 1960)   Cited 18 times
    In Bituminous Material Supply Co. v. N.L.R.B., 281 F.2d 365, 372 (8th Cir. 1960), this court said, "But even the unanimity of rulings [for the Board] is not necessarily indicative of bias."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Guild Industries Mfg. Corp.

    321 F.2d 108 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 19736. July 10, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Robert A. Armstrong, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Paul A. Saad, Granville M. Alley, Jr., of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Raymond J. Malloy, Tampa, Fla., Warren E. Hall, Jr., Bartow, Fla., Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Fields Ward, Tampa, Fla., for respondents. Before TUTTLE

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex

    229 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 12 times

    No. 15690. February 10, 1956. Victor H. Hess, Jr., Reg. Atty. N.L.R.B., New Orleans, La., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Arnold Ordman, William J. Avrutis, Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Henry J. Read, New Orleans, La., John M. Scott, Fort Worth, Tex., Samuels, Brown, Herman Scott, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and

  8. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    217 F.2d 369 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 11 times
    In Boeing Airplane Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd. (217 F.2d 369, 375-376), the board was reversed and the determination of the trial examiner reinstated where "the Trial Examiner discredited the testimony of Gerber" whereas "The Board gave credibility to Gerber and discredited Morrell".

  9. Spriggs v. Pioneer Carissa Gold Mines

    251 F.2d 61 (10th Cir. 1957)   Cited 6 times

    No. 5662. December 20, 1957. John J. Spriggs, Sr., Lander, Wyo., pro se. W.J. Wehrli, Casper, Wyo., Bard Farrall and Carleton A. Lathrop, Cheyenne, Wyo., for appellees. Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Wyoming in an action by the appellant under the Civil Rights Act (Title 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983) for the deprivation of rights, privileges and immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States