§

Valerie Franklin, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Mid-Atlantic Region), Agency.

01981401 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 21, 2000)
Valerie Franklin, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Mid-Atlantic Region), Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,614 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Jackson v. City of Killeen

    654 F.2d 1181 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 69 times
    Applying "but for" causation standard to Title VII case