§

Valentino Couture, Inc. v. Vantage Custom Classics, Inc.

No. 91118064 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 25, 2003)
Valentino Couture, Inc. v. Vantage Custom Classics, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Schor v. FMS Financial Corp.

    357 N.J. Super. 185 (App. Div. 2002)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that, where meaning of contractual term is unclear or ambiguous, party may present extrinsic evidence to demonstrate term's meaning

  2. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Buono Sales

    385 U.S. 971 (1966)   Cited 66 times

    No. 655. December 5, 1966. C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Frank C. O'Brien for petitioners. Samuel Carotenuto for respondents. Reported below: 363 F. 2d 43.

  3. Selva & Sons, Inc. v. Nina Footwear, Inc.

    705 F.2d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 27 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that challenger established standing under § 1064 notwithstanding the parties’ written agreement not to challenge each other's registration or each other's rights to use and sell goods under the mark

  4. Olde Tyme Foods, Inc. v. Roundy's, Inc.

    961 F.2d 200 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times
    Stating that "[a]s to strength of a mark . . . [third-party] registration evidence may not be given any weight . . . [because they are] not evidence of what happens in the market place"

  5. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Fort Howard Paper Co.

    772 F.2d 860 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 16 times

    Appeal No. 85-902. September 6, 1985. Dean A. Olds, Willian, Brinks, Olds, Hofer, Gilson Lione, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., argued for appellant. With him on brief was Thomas M. O'Malley, Chicago, Ill. Boyd A. Tracy, Kimberly-Clark Corp., Neenah, Wis., of counsel. George P. McAndrews, Allegretti, Newitt, Witcoff McAndrews, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., argued for appellee. With him on brief were L. Michael Jarvis, Allegretti, Newitt, Witcoff McAndrews, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., of counsel, and Joseph D. Kaufman, Fort

  6. Buono Sales, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

    363 F.2d 43 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that under New Jersey law automobile manufacturer could be held liable for interference with prospective economic relations, where in an effort to phaseout dealerships of discontinued DeSoto model, auto maker wrote to DeSoto purchasers and recommended that buyers have their cars serviced at dealerships that did not handle DeSoto

  7. Giumarra v. Harrington Heights

    33 N.J. Super. 178 (App. Div. 1954)   Cited 25 times

    Argued October 18, 1954 — Decided November 23, 1954. On appeal from the New Jersey, Bergen County Court. Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO. Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Mr. Warren Dixon, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant. The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D. Defendant Harrington Heights, Inc. appeals from a Bergen County Court judgment denying its motion for entry of judgment in its favor on its counterclaim against

  8. Buono Sales, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

    239 F. Supp. 839 (D.N.J. 1965)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 170-62. March 25, 1965. Reussille, Cornwell, Mausner Carotenuto, by Samuel Carotenuto and John A. Flood, Jr., Red Bank, N.J., for plaintiff. Pitney, Hardin Kipp, by Frank C. O'Brien, Newark, N.J., and Keith Jenkins, Detroit, Mich., for defendants. AUGELLI, District Judge. This action was tried to the Court, sitting without a jury, on the issues of liability under the first and fourth counts of the complaint, which allege, respectively, breach of contract, and tortious interference with

  9. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 336,166 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit