§

VADA of Oklahoma, Inc.

216 N.L.R.B. 750 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
VADA of Oklahoma, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 61,223 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.

    397 U.S. 913 (1970)   Cited 224 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]here can be no question that a person `endeavors' to obstruct justice when he arranges to have a prospective government witness murdered."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Okla-Inn

    488 F.2d 498 (10th Cir. 1973)   Cited 27 times

    No. 72-1737. Argued and Submitted May 22, 1973. Decided October 26, 1973. Rehearing Denied January 23, 1974. Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, Russell H. Gardner, William F. Wachter, Marjorie S. Godfreed, Peter G. Nash, John S. Irving, and Patrick Hardin, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C. A. Kothe and Richard L. Barnes, Koths Eagleton, Inc., Tulsa, Okl., for respondent. John M. Keefer, Jarboe Keefer, Tulsa, Okl., for intervenor. Before SETH and DOYLE, Circuit Judges, and LARAMORE, Senior

  5. N.L.R.B. v. West Coast Casket Company, Inc.

    469 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 19 times

    No. 72-1026. November 17, 1972. Michael Winer, Atty. (argued), Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Wilford W. Johansen, Director, Region 21, NLRB, Los Angles, Cal., for petitioner. Carl Minton (argued), of Minton Minton, Michael Posner, of Geffner Satzman, Los Angeles, Cal. (for charging party) for the respondent. Before: HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge. The Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District

  6. Majestic Molded Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Majestic Molded Products, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., (2 Cir. 1964) 330 F.2d 603, 606, the layoffs were also in order of seniority.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Automotive Controls Corporation

    406 F.2d 221 (10th Cir. 1969)   Cited 17 times
    Concluding that employer's statement that it could move its plant at any time, when union had previously stated that employer would violate law by moving its plant if union won election, was protected under section 8(c) and declaring, "[I]t is necessary to guard against the Board adopting an overly restrictive attitude toward employer communications."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Wylie Manufacturing Company

    417 F.2d 192 (10th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    In Wylie we stated that the Board has authority to issue a bargaining order without requiring the Union to demonstrate that it has been able to maintain majority status and even though it may be clear that the Union has in fact been unable to so do. In such circumstance the significant fact is that prior to the employer's unfair labor practices, the Union did have valid authorization cards from a majority of the employees.

  9. American Sanitary Products Co. v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 53 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times
    In American Sanitary Products, supra, the union organizing activities lasted three full days. During this period the employer interviewed four of its employees about union activities.

  10. Pioneer Drilling Co. v. N.L.R.B

    391 F.2d 961 (10th Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times

    No. 9618. April 5, 1968. George C. Dunlap, of Blanchette, Smith Shelton, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Robert S. Hillman, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Lawrence M. Joseph, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before PICKETT, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. DAVID T. LEWIS, Circuit Judge. This case reaches us through the petition of Pioneer Drilling Co., Inc