ยง
Utrad Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  2. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. ยง 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Daniel Construction Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 805 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 36 times
    In Daniel Construction Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 805, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 831, 86 S.Ct. 70, 15 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965), this court considered the identical question presented here. The Board, having found that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) during the course of an election campaign and that such conduct had interfered with the employees' free choice, set the election aside, and ordered that a new election be held. The company sought review of both matters in this court.

  5. Jervis Corporation, Bolivar Div. v. N.L.R.B

    387 F.2d 107 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 14 times

    No. 17340. December 13, 1967. Clarence Clifton, and W. Kerby Bowling, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner, Richard A. Brackhaln, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., on brief. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda Sher, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. WEICK

  6. Montgomery Ward Co. v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 889 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times
    In Montgomery Ward, for instance, the court modified an order that applied to all the company's plants because there was "no evidence presented... of any national pattern of unfair labor practices."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Yokell

    387 F.2d 751 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times

    No. 59, Docket 31114. Argued October 2, 1967. Decided December 4, 1967. Alan Eisenberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, and Janet Kohn, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James Carroll, New York City (Reichbart Reichbart, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. ANDERSON, Circuit

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Flemingsburg Manufacturing Co.

    300 F.2d 182 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14668. March 21, 1962. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Douglas G. Cole, Cincinnati, Ohio (Lloyd A. MacDonald, Asa R. Little, Jr., Flemingsburg, Ky., on the brief), for respondent. Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and DARR and THORNTON, District Judges. PER CURIAM. This matter involves enforcement of an Order of the NLRB entered May 12, 1961

  9. Mason Hanger-Silas Mason Co. v. N.L.R.B

    405 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 6 times

    No. 25420. December 11, 1968. S. Tom Morris, Gibson, Ochsner, Harlan, Kinney Morris, Amarillo, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Williams, Michael N. Sohn, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES and DYER, Circuit Judges, and MEHRTENS, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge: Mason Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc. (Company herein) petitions, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. ยง 160(f)

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Oliver Mach. Corp.

    210 F.2d 946 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11971. February 16, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Elizabeth W. Weston, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John W. Cummiskey, McCobb, Heaney Dunn, Grand Rapids, Mich., for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for enforcement of its order directed against the Oliver Machinery Corporation to cease and desist from dominating or interfering with the administration of, or contributing financial or other