§
UTD Corp.

20 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

    303 U.S. 261 (1938)   Cited 264 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.

  3. Labor Board v. Newport News Co.

    308 U.S. 241 (1939)   Cited 119 times
    Upholding finding of domination where company determined structure of organization and could choose whether to adopt recommendations

  4. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.

    379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 77 times
    Hearing on objections is required only if substantial factual questions are raised by objections

  6. Labor Board v. Southern Bell Co.

    319 U.S. 50 (1943)   Cited 42 times
    In Seber, the United States Supreme Court addressed a similar statute which provided that certain Indian lands would be immune from state taxes if two requirements were met: that the title to the lands be held by an Indian subject to restrictions against alienation or encumbrance or approval of the Secretary of the Interior; and the lands were purchased out of trust or restricted funds.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. H H Plastics Manufacturing Co.

    389 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. H H Plastics Mfg. Co., 389 F.2d 678, 681 (6th Cir. 1968), a case in which a majority of employees signed cards acknowledging a union as their representative, we intimated that the more relevant dates concerning an alleged company-dominated union and validity of an election were the beginning of the organizational campaign and the election itself.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Chelsea Clock Company

    411 F.2d 189 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 11 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Chelsea Clock Co., 411 F.2d 189 (1st Cir. 1969), we held that the Regional Director improperly conducted a consent election.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc.

    305 F.2d 807 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    Refusing to enforce an order that prohibited violations of the statute "in any other manner"

  10. Federal-Mogul, Coldwater D. C. D. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.2d 915 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17873. May 21, 1968. John C. O'Meara, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner; Daniel J. Tindall, Jr., Detroit, Mich., on brief; Dickinson, Wright, McKean Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., of counsel. Arthur A. Horowitz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior