§

ut explanation, while three women not of her protected class, including one lower-graded employee, were retained over the objections of the Associate Director. Minnie M. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

EEOC Appeal No. 0120140003 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 20, 2018)
ut explanation, while three women not of her protected class, including one lower-graded employee, were retained over the objections of the Associate Director. Minnie M. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

11 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 237,147 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 217,112 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,401 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  4. Young v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

    574 U.S. 972 (2015)   Cited 593 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claims under the PDA follow the McDonnell Douglas framework

  5. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer

  6. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Houston Funding II, Ltd.

    717 F.3d 425 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that while lactation is a medical condition protected from discrimination under Title VII, neither Title VII or the Pregnancy Discrimination Act mandate “special accommodations to women because of pregnancy or related conditions.”

  7. Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation, Etc.

    425 F. Supp. 318 (D. Mass. 1976)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that discharge six months after EEOC settlement and a month after an informal complaint satisfies causation requirement

  8. Gonzales v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.

    142 F. Supp. 3d 961 (C.D. Cal. 2015)   Cited 13 times
    Stating elements of PDLL failure-to-accommodate claim

  9. Redman v. Warrener

    516 F.2d 766 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 16 times
    In Redman v. Warrener, 516 F.2d 766, 768 (1st Cir. 1975), we admonished: "Summary judgment is not to be turned into a trial by affidavit."

  10. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,678 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  11. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,954 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"