§

USPS (Pittsburgh Division)

06-CA-034608 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 1, 2006)
USPS (Pittsburgh Division)

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Asarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 1401 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Finding of antiunion animus necessary to finding of section 8 violation

  4. Quazite Div. of Morrison M. F. v. N.L.R.B

    87 F.3d 493 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 16 times
    Concluding that an objection to a remedial order "in its entirety" was "far too broad to preserve a particular issue for appeal"

  5. U.S. Postal Service v. N.L.R.B

    969 F.2d 1064 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times
    Rejecting intervenor's “endeavor to achieve disposition of this case on a rationale not set forth by the agency itself”

  6. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    841 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. U.S. Postal Service, 841 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1988), the court suggested that prophylactic measures such as the union's qualification on eligibility for office were supported by "the need to assure the complete devotion of union negotiating teams to employee interests...."

  7. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    667 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that employer did not violate employee's right to union representation at investigatory interview where employer requested that the representative not interfere with questioning because the representative was present at the interview, was allowed time to consult with the employee prior to the interview, and was free to make any additions, suggestions, or clarifications after the interview

  8. Pacific Tel. Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    711 F.2d 134 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that "once union representation has been afforded, the representative may speak for the employee he represents and either the union representative or the employee may make the request for pre[-]interview conference"

  9. U. S. Steel Corp. v. R. S. Noonan, Inc.

    547 F.2d 1166 (Fed. Cir. 1977)   Cited 8 times

    No. 76-1582. January 17, 1977. D.N.J. DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS AFFIRMED

  10. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. N.L.R.B

    584 F.2d 360 (10th Cir. 1978)   Cited 4 times
    Denying enforcement of Board's order where union had a policy of noncooperation pursuant to which union officials, including the official who requested the pre-interview consultation, "had urged [employees] not to cooperate with management in any investigatory interviews"

  11. Section 1209 - Applicability of Federal labor laws

    39 U.S.C. § 1209   Cited 45 times

    (a) Employee-management relations shall, to the extent not inconsistent with provisions of this title, be subject to the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 7 of title 29. (b) The provisions of chapter 11 of title 29 shall be applicable to labor organizations that have or are seeking to attain recognition under section 1203 of this title, and to such organizations, officers, agents, shop stewards, other representatives, and members to the extent to which such provisions would be applicable if