§

USF Red Star, Inc.

339 N.L.R.B. 389 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
USF Red Star, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Carrabus v. Schneider

    111 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 2000)   Cited 10 times
    Stating "there is no reason to believe that a state court TRO issued on notice, and in anticipation of a preliminary injunction hearing, is exempt upon removal to the federal forum from the Rule 65 time limitation that clearly does govern an ex parte TRO in the same circumstances."

  3. Eastern Omni Constr. Inc. v. National Labor

    170 F.3d 418 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 2 times
    Finding valid safety concerns justified the ban on union decals on hardhats

  4. Howard Johnson Co. v. N.L.R.B

    702 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 11 times
    Stating that substantial evidence review requires that one “take contradictory evidence in the record into account” (quoting Universal Camera, 340 U.S. at 487–88, 71 S.Ct. 456)

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Floridan Hotel of Tampa, Inc.

    318 F.2d 545 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 11 times

    No. 20081. June 7, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. L. Robert Frank, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before RIVES, LEWIS, and BELL, Circuit Judges. Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge. This case presents a novel question: May an employer with no discriminatory purpose prohibit the wearing of pins indicating union membership or status