U.S. Indus. Alcohol Co. v. Comm'r

7 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Ludey

    274 U.S. 295 (1927)   Cited 229 times
    In Ludey the taxpayer had taken deductions for depletion of his mining properties; but when the properties were sold in the taxable year in question, the taxpayer did not, in computing the gain from the sale, adjust the basis of the property to reflect the depletion deductions.
  2. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.

    247 U.S. 179 (1918)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress may tax a reseller only on its gross income, not its gross receipts
  3. Weiss v. Wiener

    279 U.S. 333 (1929)   Cited 176 times
    In Weiss v. Wiener, 279 U.S. 333, 335, 49 S.Ct. 337, 73 L.Ed. 720, it is said that a "loss must be actual and present, not merely contemplated as more or less sure to occur in the future."
  4. Real Estate Title Co. v. U.S.

    309 U.S. 13 (1940)   Cited 101 times
    Precluding consideration of grounds for refund not raise in the refund claim
  5. Lucas v. North Texas Co.

    281 U.S. 11 (1930)   Cited 94 times
    In Lucas v. North Texas Lumber Co., 281 U.S. 11, 50 S.Ct. 184, 74 L.Ed. 668, a ten-day option to purchase timber lands was given to a solvent offeree on December 27, 1916. Having found the title satisfactory, the option holder on December 30 arranged for the money needed, gave notice of exercise of the option and declared itself ready to close the transaction and pay the purchase price "as soon as the papers were prepared"; and the offeror immediately ceased operating its saw mill and withdrew all its employees.
  6. Matter of Brown

    242 N.Y. 1 (N.Y. 1926)   Cited 75 times
    Recognizing actually acquired good will is a valuable property interest transferrable and protectable by law as a business asset
  7. Schoellkopf Anilines&sChemical Works v. United States

    3 F. Supp. 417 (Fed. Cl. 1933)   Cited 6 times

    3 F.Supp. 417 (Ct.Cl. 1933) SCHOELLKOPF ANILINEs&sCHEMICAL WORKS, Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. J-570. United States Court of Claims. May 8, 1933 Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. WHALEY, Judge, dissenting. James McCormick Mitchell, of Buffalo, N. Y. (John L. Kenefick, Ralph M. Andrews, and Kenefick, Cooke, Mitchell, Bass & Letchworth, all of Buffalo, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiffs. Erwin N. Griswold, of Washington, D. C., and Charles B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Ralph C. Williamson,