§

U.S. Ecology Corp.

331 N.L.R.B. 223 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
U.S. Ecology Corp.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. In re Sunset Bay Associates

    944 F.2d 1503 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that depositions may be admissible as affidavits if the deponent was sworn and the testimony was "`made on personal knowledge and set forth facts that were admissible in evidence'"

  5. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    671 F.2d 237 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 50 times
    Finding that the "Union acted reasonably in relying" on Capitol-Husting's offer to match financial package offered by rival company that the Union was also negotiating with, such that Capitol-Husting was acting in bad faith to claim that Union's failure to expressly accept this offer nullified its obligation to abide by the contract

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Overnite Transp. Co.

    938 F.2d 815 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that employer engaged in surface bargaining despite the fact employer had attended six bargaining sessions with union, commented on proposals, offered counterproposals, and maintained bargaining stance that had at least some merit, because vice president of employer expressly stated that employer would not sign contract with union, openly threatened to shut down terminal in order to defeat union, and implied that employer would force strike situation and permanently dismiss those employees who left to join picket lines

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 46

    149 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times

    No. 97-4021. Argued September 25, 1997. Decided June 26, 1998. On March 22, 1996, the National Labor Relations Board entered a remedial order after finding that Local 46, Metallic Lathers Union and Reinforcing Iron Workers of New York and Vicinity, had committed certain unfair labor practices in violation of sections 8(b)(1)(A) and (b)(2) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1)(A) and (b)(2). The Board petitions for a decree enforcing that order. Because the Board's finding of

  10. Horsehead Resource Dev. v. National Lab. rel

    154 F.3d 328 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 96-6268/6466 Argued: October 27, 1997 Decided and Filed: August 28, 1998 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Harold George Korbee, Roger K. Quillen, Charles Kelso, FISHER PHILLIPS, Atlanta, Georgia, for Petitioner. Frederick C. Havard, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLATE COURT BRANCH, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Roger K. Quillen, FISHER PHILLIPS, Atlanta