§

U.S. Cosmetics Corporation

01-CA-135282 (N.L.R.B. May. 17, 2016)
U.S. Cosmetics Corporation

22 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,697 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 181 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  4. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.

    528 F.2d 1384 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 253 times
    Upholding disqualification of a law firm that was representing the plaintiff in an antitrust matter but had a partner who was representing the defendant in separate but "somewhat similar" litigation, id. at 1385

  7. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  8. Conley v. N.L.R.B

    520 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 13 times
    Finding anti-union animus when employer terminated an employee for previously tolerated conduct

  9. N.L.R.B. v. S.E. Nichols, Inc.

    862 F.2d 952 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 30 times
    Finding that violations at various locations managed by the same district supervisor justified an order covering all locations managed by that district supervisor

  10. Double Eagle Hotel Casino v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.3d 1249 (10th Cir. 2005)   Cited 10 times
    Sustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,080 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB