U.S. Abatement, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  2. Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.

    371 U.S. 224 (1963)   Cited 133 times
    In Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."
  3. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Rockwell-Standard, Trans. Axle

    410 F.2d 953 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 44 times

    No. 18651. May 29, 1969. Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Neal J. Conway, Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief. Leonard L. Scheinholtz, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent, Jonathan L. Alder, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief. Before PHILLIPS, EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges. Judge Edwards took no part in the consideration of decision of this case

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Borden, Borden Chemical Division

    600 F.2d 313 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 19 times
    Noting that whether conduct is inherently destructive can turn on "whether the conduct discriminated solely upon the basis of participation in strikes or union activity"
  6. Procter Gamble Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times

    No. 78-1716. Submitted March 12, 1979. Decided August 23, 1979. Harold S. Freeman of Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued and Michael S. Glassman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on appendix and briefs, for petitioner. Edward S. Dorsey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. argued, and Andrew E. Tranovich, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel; John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel; Robert E. Allen, Acting Assoc. Gen. Counsel; and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C.,

  7. General Motors Corp., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    700 F.2d 1083 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that the union need not affirmatively demonstrate the relevance of information requested
  8. Pinnacle Books v. Harlequin Enterprises LTD

    661 F.2d 910 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times

    No. 81-7379. June 18, 1981. Appeal from S.D.N.Y. DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS AFFIRMED

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Peninsula Ass'n for Retarded

    627 F.2d 202 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 10 times

    No. 79-7053. Argued and Submitted April 16, 1980. Decided September 9, 1980. Lawrence E. Blatnik, Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner; Elliott Moore, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., on brief. Kathleen Marie Kelly, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for respondent; Nancy L. Ober, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff Tichy, William C. Wright, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. On Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRILL and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and WYATT, District

  10. Western Massachusetts Elec. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    573 F.2d 101 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times
    Acknowledging that when an employer makes "assertions, the duty to bargain in good faith required [the employer] to provide, upon demand, such information as was reasonably necessary to substantiate them"