§

UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.

366 NLRB No. 111 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  3. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  4. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  5. Vanguard Fire Supply Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    468 F.3d 952 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 05-2497, 05-2630. Argued: September 20, 2006. Decided and Filed: November 21, 2006. Appeal from the petition for review of final National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). ARGUED: Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner. Stacy G. Zimmerman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Jason J. Valtos, Osborne Law Offices, Washington, D.C., for Intervener. ON BRIEF: Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner. Stacy G. Zimmerman

  6. All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    540 F. App'x 484 (6th Cir. 2013)

    Case Nos. 11-2184/11-2282 08-28-2013 ALL SEASONS CLIMATE CONTROL, INC., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. ALICE M. BATCHELDER NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0797n.06 ON APPEAL FROM THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; MERRITT and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges. ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. ("All Seasons") appeals from a decision and order of the National

  7. Lee Lumber and Bldg. Material v. N.L.R.B

    310 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that this court "`review the Board's factual conclusions' only for `substantial evidence,' and must `uphold the Board's application of law to facts unless arbitrary or otherwise erroneous'" (quoting Harter Tomato Products Co. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 934, 937 (D.C. Cir. 1998))

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Pennsylvania Telephone Guild

    799 F.2d 84 (3d Cir. 1986)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that a union violates the NLRA by insisting on nonmandatory subjects as a precondition to bargaining

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Call, Burnup and Sims Inc.

    393 F.2d 412 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 3 times

    No. 6993. Heard February 6, 1968. Decided April 12, 1968. Norton J. Come, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Linda Sher, Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Ray C. Muller, Miami, Fla., with whom Muller, Schenerlein Bare, Miami, Fla., was on brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE

  10. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"