Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University

Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control

McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional

Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Int. U. of Operating Eng. v. N.L.R.B

Finding the common management prong satisfied by several interchanges of higher-level managers and officers between the corporations

N.L.R.B. v. North Shore University Hosp

In North Shore, we identified the reasons behind the concern about an employee organization in which supervisors are active participants. "First, supervisors who participate actively in a professional organization which represents (or is seeking to represent) rank and file employees who serve under them, are by the very nature of their relationship to their employer and to the professional organization subject to conflicting pressures."

Section 9301 - Definitions