Upholsterers Frame & Bedding Workers, Etc.

20 Cited authorities

Thornhill v. Alabama
310 U.S. 88 (1940) Cited 1,704 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights
Giboney v. Empire Storage Co.
336 U.S. 490 (1949) Cited 696 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that speech integral to criminal conduct is not protected
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Hughes v. Superior Court
339 U.S. 460 (1950) Cited 285 times
In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
325 U.S. 797 (1945) Cited 304 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
341 U.S. 694 (1951) Cited 246 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board
357 U.S. 93 (1958) Cited 201 times
Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.
354 U.S. 284 (1957) Cited 163 times
In Teamsters Union, supra, a railroad was held to be barred from seeking relief in the state courts against a secondary boycott.
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl
315 U.S. 769 (1942) Cited 236 times
Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing
Teamsters Union v. Hanke
339 U.S. 470 (1950) Cited 157 times
Including footnote 5

Upholsterers Frame & Bedding Workers, Etc.

20 Cited authorities

Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights

Holding that speech integral to criminal conduct is not protected

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.

Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business

Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

In Teamsters Union, supra, a railroad was held to be barred from seeking relief in the state courts against a secondary boycott.

Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing

Including footnote 5