§
UPF Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,302 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.

    596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

  5. American Distributing Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    715 F.2d 446 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 28 times
    Applying same principle

  6. Armco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    832 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 18 times
    In Armco, the Sixth Circuit held that the § 10(b) period did not commence when the employer communicated its intent to recognize another union, but only when the other union actually signed an agreement with the employer, thereby consummating the labor practices violation.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    827 F.2d 530 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 7 times

    No. 84-7556. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1985. Decided September 4, 1987. Kenneth J. Pederson and David E. Williams, Richland, Wash., Gary P. Scholick and Richard N. Hill, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Kenneth Hipp and Collis Suzanne Stocking, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before HUG, FARRIS and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. HUG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") applies for enforcement

  8. Wis. River Val. Dist. Council, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 11 times
    In Wisconsin River Valley Dist. Council v. NLRB, 532 F.2d 47 (1976), the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit also took a position seemingly at odds with the judgment under review here.

  9. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,061 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB