§

Unverferth Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. J. & M. Manufacturing Co., Inc.

13200694 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 9, 2015)
Unverferth Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. J. & M. Manufacturing Co., Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Demaco Corp. v. F. Von Langsdorff Licensing

    851 F.2d 1387 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 166 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that patentee bears the burden of proving a nexus between claimed secondary considerations and the merits of the patented invention

  2. Toledo Co. v. Standard Parts

    307 U.S. 350 (1939)   Cited 120 times
    In Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, 307 U.S. 350, 355, 356, 59 S.Ct. 897, 899, 83 L.Ed. 1334, the court said: "The torch body was old in the art to which it belonged.

  3. Application of Allen

    51 C.C.P.A. 809 (C.C.P.A. 1963)   Cited 6 times

    Patent Appeal No. 7016. December 12, 1963. Ellsworth H. Mosher, Stevens, Davis, Miller Mosher, Washington, D.C., Richard W. Sternberg, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C. (Jack E. Armore, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges. SMITH, Judge. The issue in the present appeal requires a determination of whether the differences between the cited prior art and the invention disclosed

  4. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 397 times   186 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  5. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 45 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution

  6. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 21 times   40 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A

  7. Section 90.2 - Notice; service

    37 C.F.R. § 90.2   2 Legal Analyses

    (a)For an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 141 . (1) (i) In all appeals, the notice of appeal required by 35 U.S.C. 142 must be filed with the Director by electronic mail to the email address indicated on the United States Patent and Trademark Office's web page for the Office of the General Counsel. This electronically submitted notice will be accorded a receipt date, which is the date in Eastern Time when the correspondence is received in the Office, regardless of whether that date is a Saturday, Sunday,