§

University of Great Falls

331 N.L.R.B. 1663 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
University of Great Falls

15 Cited authorities

  1. City of Boerne v. Flores

    521 U.S. 507 (1997)   Cited 1,830 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that RFRA is unconstitutional in so far as it permits suits against state actors

  2. Employment Div. v. Smith

    494 U.S. 872 (1990)   Cited 2,318 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the limitation articulated in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398-i.e., that governmental actions that substantially burden a religious practice must be justified by a compelling governmental interest-does not apply to neutral, generally applicable laws

  3. Lemon v. Kurtzman

    403 U.S. 602 (1971)   Cited 2,349 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding school-aid statute authorizing government inspection of parochial school records created an impermissible "intimate and continuing relationship between church and state" because it required the state "to determine which expenditures are religious and which are secular"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop

    440 U.S. 490 (1979)   Cited 459 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction

  5. Sutton v. Providence St. Joseph Medical Center

    192 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 693 times
    Holding that the “ultimate issue” in deciding whether a private defendant can be sued under RFRA is whether “the alleged infringement of federal rights” is “fairly attributable to the government”

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University

    444 U.S. 672 (1980)   Cited 183 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control

  7. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  8. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith v. Kravttz

    525 U.S. 811 (1998)   Cited 39 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the portion of RFRA applicable to federal law constitutional

  9. Christians v. Evangelical

    141 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 1998)   Cited 94 times
    Holding RFRA constitutional as applied to federal law

  10. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    463 U.S. 147 (1983)   Cited 21 times
    Vacating and remanding for consideration of statutory question

  11. Section 2000bb-1 - Free exercise of religion protected

    42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1   Cited 1,147 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Providing for "appropriate relief" in judicial suit