§

University of Bridgeport

229 N.L.R.B. 1074 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
University of Bridgeport

4 Cited authorities

  1. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  2. Lozano Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Lozano Enterprises v. NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 814, a complete tentative agreement was reached; this was revised and then signed by the company's president but retained, until after the certification year expired, by its labor consultant, with a misrepresentation on his part to the union that the agreement had not been signed.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Coletti Color Prints, Inc.

    387 F.2d 298 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 11 times

    No. 33, Docket 31146. Argued September 21, 1967. Decided December 1, 1967. Leonard Wagman, Elliott Moore, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Hugh P. Husband, Jr., New York City, for respondent. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Huttig Sash and Door Company

    362 F.2d 217 (4th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times
    In Huttig we found that the granting of six per cent interest by the Board was not an abuse of its discretion, and we now reaffirm this holding.