11 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 657 times 11 Legal AnalysesHolding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop
440 U.S. 490 (1979) Cited 460 times 48 Legal AnalysesHolding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction
Tilton v. Richardson
403 U.S. 672 (1971) Cited 354 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that a federal statute which provides grants to colleges and universities for the construction of buildings and facilities used exclusively for secular educational purposes may be applied to sectarian institutions without violating the Establishment Clause, but allowing the Federal government 20-year oversight authority over the use of any facility constructed with such funds to ensure its nonsectarian use, violates the Religion Clauses
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University
444 U.S. 672 (1980) Cited 183 times 16 Legal AnalysesHolding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. N.L.R.B
708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 19 timesIn St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. NLRB, 708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983), we upheld Board jurisdiction over a hospital affiliated with the Sisters of Mercy, a Catholic order.
N.L.R.B. v. St. Louis Christian Home
663 F.2d 60 (8th Cir. 1981) Cited 11 timesIn NLRB v. St. Louis Christian Home, 663 F.2d 60 (8th Cir. 1981), for example, the Eighth Circuit upheld the Board's jurisdiction over a church-operated home for battered, abused, and neglected children.
N.L.R.B. v. Yeshiva University
582 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1978) Cited 9 timesNo. 852, Docket 77-4182. Argued April 26, 1978. Decided July 31, 1978. Howard E. Perlstein, Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.), for petitioner. Saul G. Kramer, New York City (Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, New York City, Peter G. Samuels, Gerald A. Bodner, New York City, Labor Counsel to respondent), for respondent. Ronald H
N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company
350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965) Cited 15 timesNo. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.
328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 12 timesNo. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit