§

Universal Syndications, Inc.

347 N.L.R.B. 624 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Universal Syndications, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  4. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  5. Fivecap, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.3d 768 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that circulating a petition constituted concerted activity

  6. Vemco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    79 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 94-6378, 94-6500. Argued January 29, 1996. Decided March 22, 1996. Peter J. Kok and Elizabeth M. McIntyre (argued and briefed), Miller, Johnson, Snell Cumminskey, Grand Rapids, MI, for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent. Joseph Oertel (argued), Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Asso. Gen. Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, Jr. (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order

  7. New River Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    945 F.2d 1290 (4th Cir. 1991)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that dress codes are a "condition[] of employment which employees may seek to improve" while receiving the safeguards of the NLRA

  8. Brown Root, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    634 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 11 times

    No. 79-3491. January 19, 1981. Powell, Brown Maverick, William L. Bedman, William A. Brown, Harry M. Thomson, Jr., Houston, Tex., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Diana Orantes Ceresi, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition to Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, RUBIN and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board found

  9. Sandlin v. First National Bank

    253 N.E.2d 313 (Ohio Ct. App. 1969)

    No. 10831 Decided August 11, 1969. Sales — Numismatic coins — Delivery to bank per buyer's instructions — Gratuitous bailment created — Buyer's check in payment not honored — Suit against bank for negligence — Seller's right to maintain — Jury questions. 1. Where, in a sale of numismatic coins, the seller, pursuant to the buyer's instructions to deliver the coins to a designated bank, consigns the shipment to the Safe Deposit Vault of the designated bank, with instructions to "Please notify security