§

Universal Remote Control, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc.

07990862 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 26, 2013)
Universal Remote Control, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.

    447 U.S. 102 (1980)   Cited 1,834 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that information obtained in response to a FOIA request was a "public disclosure" for purposes of the Consumer Product Safety Act

  2. Rubin v. United States

    449 U.S. 424 (1981)   Cited 699 times
    Holding that pledging securities as collateral for a loan constitutes an "offer or sale" under § 17 of the Securities Act

  3. United States v. James

    478 U.S. 597 (1986)   Cited 230 times
    Finding legislative history did not merit a departure from the plain language of the statute

  4. Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg

    849 F.2d 1422 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 656 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Board may not indefinitely stay an ex parte reexamination in light of parallel district court litigation via the "special dispatch" standard

  5. Ford-Clifton v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

    661 F.3d 655 (Fed. Cir. 2011)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that "the Board properly held that neither alleged financial hardship nor inability to engage counsel establish good cause for delay" of more than 11 months

  6. Bonneville Associates v. Barram

    165 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 28 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs alleged mistaken assumption with respect to its ability to reinstate previously withdrawn appeal was insufficient basis for equitable tolling

  7. Graves v. Principi

    294 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 23 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal without prejudice of his appeal to Veterans Court put him in the same position as if the appeal had never been filed

  8. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft v. Quigg

    917 F.2d 522 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 7 times
    Stating that "[w]hen faced with [statutory] ambiguity it is incumbent upon this court to examine the legislative history to discern Congress' intent"

  9. Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41   Cited 109,258 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"

  10. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 538 times   883 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  11. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 397 times   186 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  12. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 370 times   627 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  13. Section 42.107 - Preliminary response to petition

    37 C.F.R. § 42.107   Cited 93 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Requiring initiation of IPR within six months of filing and a decision within twelve months thereafter

  14. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 45 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution