§

Universal Electronics, Inc.

IPR2020-01012 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 10, 2020)
Universal Electronics, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Techs.

    140 S. Ct. 1367 (2020)   Cited 36 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding that departure in language shows a departure in meaning

  2. Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC

    973 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2020)   Cited 21 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board joinder decisions are reviewable because they concern the "manner in which the already-instituted IPR proceeded"

  3. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 555 times   901 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  4. Section 1 - Establishment

    35 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 518 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Noting that Congress did not intend to change these "narrowing interpretations"

  5. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 411 times   205 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  6. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 381 times   636 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  7. Section 42.122 - Multiple proceedings and Joinder

    37 C.F.R. § 42.122   Cited 5 times   22 Legal Analyses

    (a)Multiple proceedings. Where another matter involving the patent is before the Office, the Board may during the pendency of the inter partes review enter any appropriate order regarding the additional matter including providing for the stay, transfer, consolidation, or termination of any such matter. (b)Request for joinder. Joinder may be requested by a patent owner or petitioner. Any request for joinder must be filed, as a motion under § 42.22 , no later than one month after the institution date