UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. AND UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., AS SINGLE OR JOINT EMPLOYERS

17 Cited authorities

Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
461 U.S. 731 (1983) Cited 983 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning
573 U.S. 513 (2014) Cited 280 times 150 Legal Analyses
Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”
BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB
536 U.S. 516 (2002) Cited 314 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts
Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters
436 U.S. 180 (1978) Cited 554 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
Longshoremen v. Davis
476 U.S. 380 (1986) Cited 320 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that where "a state court . . . ha no subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the issue . . ., any judgment issued by the state court will be void ab initio"
New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.
560 U.S. 674 (2010) Cited 142 times 53 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.
404 U.S. 138 (1971) Cited 163 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that board's attempt to "enjoin" or "restrain" state court injunction fell within exception of 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids court from granting "an injunction to stay" such proceedings unless otherwise authorized
D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013) Cited 142 times 145 Legal Analyses
Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co.
309 U.S. 261 (1940) Cited 212 times
In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029
409 U.S. 213 (1972) Cited 53 times
In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.

UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. AND UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., AS SINGLE OR JOINT EMPLOYERS

17 Cited authorities

Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

Holding that where "a state court . . . ha no subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the issue . . ., any judgment issued by the state court will be void ab initio"

Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

Holding that board's attempt to "enjoin" or "restrain" state court injunction fell within exception of 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids court from granting "an injunction to stay" such proceedings unless otherwise authorized

Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.

In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.