§

United Water Pennsylvania Inc.

06-CA-037236 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 31, 2011)
United Water Pennsylvania Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  5. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  6. Marshall Durbin Poultry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    39 F.3d 1312 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 13 times

    No. 93-4057. December 16, 1994. Sidney F. Lewis, Henry T. Arrington, Kullman, Inman, Bee, Downing Banta, New Orleans, LA, for appellant. William Baudler, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for appellee. Hugh Frank Malone, Regional Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, LA, for other Interested Parties. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD

  7. Graphic Communications Int. v. N.L.R.B

    977 F.2d 1168 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 14 times   4 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-3901. Argued September 25, 1992. Decided October 21, 1992. Lee W. Jackson, Martin Ganzglass, O'Donnell, Schwartz Anderson, Washington, D.C., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr. (argued), Logothetis Pence, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Lawrence T. Zimmerman (argued), Washington, D.C., Charles M. Roesch, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for

  8. Eastern Maine Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    658 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming bargaining order "in view of the serious and pervasive violations disclosed in the record"

  9. Keystone Steel Wire v. N.L.R.B

    41 F.3d 746 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 4 times

    No. 93-1357. Argued November 8, 1994. Decided December 16, 1994. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Mark G. Arnold, St. Louis, MO, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. William M. Bernstein, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Sher, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC. Before WALD, GINSBURG and TATEL, Circuit

  10. AMF Bowling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    977 F.2d 141 (4th Cir. 1992)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 91-2553, 91-2596 and 91-2597. Argued April 6, 1992. Decided October 5, 1992. R. Daniel Bordoni, Bond, Schoeneck King, Syracuse, N.Y., argued (W. Carter Younger, McGuire, Woods, Battle Boothe, Richmond, Va., on brief), for petitioner. James R. LaVaute, Blitman King, Syracuse, N.Y., Joseph A. Oertel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, D. Randall Frye, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler, on brief), for respondent