United Supermarkets, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

San Diego Unions v. Garmon
359 U.S. 236 (1959) Cited 2,558 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"
Farmer v. Carpenters
430 U.S. 290 (1977) Cited 607 times
Holding that an otherwise preempted claim could be prosecuted in state or federal court if the conduct alleged was sufficiently outrageous
Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters
436 U.S. 180 (1978) Cited 554 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
424 U.S. 507 (1976) Cited 543 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
Garner v. Teamsters Union
346 U.S. 485 (1953) Cited 690 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.
Food Employees v. Logan Plaza
391 U.S. 308 (1968) Cited 379 times
Extending Marsh to cover a private shopping center to the extent that it sought to restrict speech about its businesses
Automobile Workers v. Russell
356 U.S. 634 (1958) Cited 314 times
Holding that state tort claim for wrongful interference with a lawful business relationship was not preempted where there were threats of violence
United Workers v. Laburnum Corp.
347 U.S. 656 (1954) Cited 324 times
Sustaining damages award under state law where union agents "threatened and intimidated . . . plaintiff's officers . . . with violence"
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

United Supermarkets, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

Holding that an otherwise preempted claim could be prosecuted in state or federal court if the conduct alleged was sufficiently outrageous

Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.

Extending Marsh to cover a private shopping center to the extent that it sought to restrict speech about its businesses

Holding that state tort claim for wrongful interference with a lawful business relationship was not preempted where there were threats of violence

Sustaining damages award under state law where union agents "threatened and intimidated . . . plaintiff's officers . . . with violence"

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot