5 Cited authorities
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
N.L.R.B. v. Truckdrivers, Etc., Union No. 100
532 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1976) Cited 17 timesNo. 75-1659. Argued October 14, 1975. Decided March 24, 1976. Rehearing Denied May 7, 1976. Elliott Moore, Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Paul H. Tobias, Goldman, Cole Putnick, Cincinnati, Ohio, for intervenor. Jonas B. Katz, Gettler Katz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Before PECK, Circuit Judge, MARKEY, Chief Judge, United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and ENGEL, Circuit Judge. Sitting by designation. PECK, Circuit
Graphic Arts Int'l U., L. No. 280 v. N.L.R.B
596 F.2d 904 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 10 timesNo. 78-1950. May 14, 1979. David A. Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Walter C. Schumann, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHOY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and INGRAM, District Judge. The Honorable William A. Ingram, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. CHOY, Circuit Judge: Graphic Arts International Union, Local 280 (Union or Local 280) petitions for
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local No. 8
465 F.2d 974 (9th Cir. 1972) Cited 6 timesNo. 71-1768. August 21, 1972. Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Roy O. Hoffman, Director, NLRB, Region 20, Stephen H. Naiman, Atty., Herman M. Levy, Atty., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Victor J. VanBourg, W. Reece Bader, of Orrick, Herrington, Rowley Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before HAMLIN, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Warehousemen's Union Local 17, International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union
451 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir. 1971) Cited 6 timesUpholding Board remedial order requiring union to make employer whole for financial expenditures made by employer as result of an unlawfully coerced collective bargaining agreement