§

United Steelworkers of America

253 N.L.R.B. 961 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
United Steelworkers of America

4 Cited authorities

  1. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  2. Amoco Production Co. v. N.L.R.B

    613 F.2d 107 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that remand is appropriate when the Board fails to adequately explain the factual basis for its opinion

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bear Archery

    587 F.2d 812 (6th Cir. 1977)   Cited 7 times

    No. 76-2041. May 10, 1977. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John Ferguson, Michael Stein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Douglas C. Dahn, Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before WEICK and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and GREEN, District Judge. Honorable Ben C. Green, Senior District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ORDER The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for enforcement of

  4. Rule 804 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 804   Cited 4,048 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing an exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule when the party against whom the statement is offered has engaged in wrongdoing which procures the unavailability of the declarant