§

United States Service Industries

314 N.L.R.B. 30 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
United States Service Industries

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  4. Holyoke Visiting Nurses Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    11 F.3d 302 (1st Cir. 1993)   Cited 37 times
    In Holyoke, 11 F.3d at 307, the court upheld a joint employer finding based on the entity's "joint control of the... employees by, inter alia, its unfettered power to reject any person referred to it by [the employer] and its substantial control over the day-to-day activities of the referred employees."

  5. Conair Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    721 F.2d 1355 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 48 times
    In Conair, the Board, in marked contrast to this case, had specifically found that no other remedy could "dissipate the lingering effects of [Conair's] massive and unrelenting coercive conduct" which "ha[d] foreclosed any possibility of holding a fair representation election."

  6. Gold Coast Restaurant Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    995 F.2d 257 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times
    Canvassing other precedents holding that initiation of new discipline system in retaliation for union activity violates the Act

  7. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  8. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Sencore, Inc.

    558 F.2d 433 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 10 times

    No. 76-1878. Submitted May 18, 1977. Decided June 23, 1977. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Frank Phillips, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Gale E. Fisher, May, Johnson Burke, Sioux Falls, S. D., for respondent; John E. Burke and Gale E. Fisher, Sioux Falls, S. D., on brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit

  10. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,894 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions