United States Postal Service

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."
  2. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"
  3. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.

    81 F.R.D. 628 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)   Cited 2 times

    In a civil antitrust action, the Government moved for an order directing a vice-president of the corporate defendant to produce for inspection and copying certain documents under his custody and control that had been the subject of a deposition subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum. The District Court, Edelstein, Chief Judge, held that: (1) although the Government's document demand was substantial, defendant failed to show that the burden of production involved was " unreasonable and oppressive"