§

United States Postal Service

366 NLRB No. 168 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
United States Postal Service

13 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  5. Gulf States Mfg. Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    704 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that an employer preserved an issue by ambiguously referencing the issue in a motion for reconsideration

  6. Parts v. National

    260 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2008)

    Nos. 07-1178, 07-1290. Argued December 4, 2007. Decided January 7, 2008. On Petition for Review and Cross-application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (12-CA-16449; 12-CA16741). ARGUED: Cathy M. Stutin, Fisher Phillips, L.L.P., Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, for Parts Depot, Incorporated. Christopher Warren Young, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for the Board; Brent Garren, Unite Here, New York, New York, for Unite Here

  7. Mahon v. N.L.R.B

    808 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "it has long been recognized that a union may waive a member's statutorily protected rights" (citing Metro. Edison Co. v. NLRB, 460 U.S. 693, 705, 103 S.Ct. 1467, 75 L.Ed.2d 387 (1983))

  8. Overnite Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    372 F.2d 765 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times

    Nos. 10570, 10617. Argued November 4, 1966. Decided February 6, 1967. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Ernest W. Machen, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for petitioner Overnite Transp. Co. Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C., (Michael F. Grdina, Willoughby, Ohio, on brief), for petitioner Teamsters Local Union No. 171. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Atlas Microfilming

    753 F.2d 313 (3d Cir. 1985)   Cited 4 times

    No. 83-3548. Argued September 12, 1984. Decided January 31, 1985. William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Perlstein, Abby Propis Simms (Argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Daniel C. Cohen (Argued), Jeffrey L. Braff, Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Before ADAMS, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. OPINION

  10. N.L.R.B. v. L. 964, United Bro., Carpenters

    447 F.2d 643 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 6 times

    No. 808, Docket 35598. Argued May 12, 1971. Decided August 30, 1971. Leonard Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frank H. Itkin, William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. William M. Mulderig, New City, N.Y. (Mulderig O'Connor, New City, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, Chief Judge, WATERMAN, and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: For fifteen