§

United States Postal Service

365 NLRB No. 92 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
United States Postal Service

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 274 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 227 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  6. Doron Precision Systems, Inc. v. FAAC, Inc.

    423 F. Supp. 2d 173 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)   Cited 73 times
    Finding that "in this district, the only conduct excluded from Noerr-Pennington coverage is conduct that never genuinely intended to influence government action"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Whitesell Corp.

    638 F.3d 883 (8th Cir. 2011)   Cited 12 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of enforcement on the basis that the Board lacked a proper quorum did not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to consider the case anew

  8. Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  9. N.L.R.B. v. New York Telephone Co.

    930 F.2d 1009 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 23 times

    No. 1010, Docket 90-4136. Argued January 31, 1991. Decided April 16, 1991. Paul Hitterman, Washington, D.C. (Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.), for petitioner. Michael Hertzberg, New York City, for respondent. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before KEARSE, PRATT and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges. McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: This is a petition by the National Labor Relations

  10. River Oak Center for Children v. N.L.R.B

    273 F. App'x 677 (9th Cir. 2008)

    Nos. 05-77388, 06-71055. Argued and Submitted January 16, 2008. Filed April 16, 2008. James E. Mesnier, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner. Christopher W. Young, Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., Fred B. Jacob, Washington, DC, Joseph P. Norelli, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 20-CA-31640-1. Before: NOONAN, W. FLETCHER, and BEA, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

  11. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 29,623 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  12. Section 101 - Postal policy

    39 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 345 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the Postal Service is "a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by Act of Congress, and supported by the people"