United States Postal Service

9 Cited authorities

Sweeney v. St. Joseph's Hosp
980 F.2d 724 (3d Cir. 1992) Cited 31 times
Holding that no Fourth Amendment rights were violated when officer "did not intend the bullet to bring plaintiff within his control"
N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Serv
486 F.3d 683 (10th Cir. 2007) Cited 11 times
Holding injunctions that broadly order the enjoined party simply to obey the law and not violate the statute are generally impermissible
National Labor v. U.S. Postal
660 F.3d 65 (1st Cir. 2011) Cited 6 times
Holding the "fact that information may be disclosed ‘as required by law’ does not itself defeat all expectations of privacy, nor does it create an expectation that the information will be disclosed automatically whenever it is relevant to a union"
Kelley v. F.E.R.C
96 F.3d 1482 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 15 times
Rejecting "implicit" arguments as insufficient
N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Serv
477 F.3d 263 (5th Cir. 2007) Cited 1 times
No. 05-61168. January 26, 2007. Curtis Wells, Regional Dir., NLRB, Fort Worth, TX, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Meredith Lee Jason, Kellie J. Isbell (argued), NLRB, Washington, DC, for NLRB. Stephan J. Boardman (argued), U.S. Postal Serv., Washington, DC, Doris Godinez-Phillip, U.S. Postal Serv., Southwest Law Dept., Dallas, TX, for Respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before JONES, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and GARZA, Circuit
U.S. Postal Service v. N.L.R.B
969 F.2d 1064 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Cited 12 times
Rejecting intervenor's “endeavor to achieve disposition of this case on a rationale not set forth by the agency itself”
N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service
888 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1989) Cited 14 times
Holding that an employer violates the NLRA when it fails “to provide information that is needed by the bargaining representative for the proper performance of its duties”
N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service
841 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1988) Cited 13 times
In NLRB v. U.S. Postal Service, 841 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1988), the court suggested that prophylactic measures such as the union's qualification on eligibility for office were supported by "the need to assure the complete devotion of union negotiating teams to employee interests...."
Section 101 - Postal policy
39 U.S.C. § 101 Cited 346 times 2 Legal Analyses
Stating that the Postal Service is "a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by Act of Congress, and supported by the people"

United States Postal Service

9 Cited authorities

Holding that no Fourth Amendment rights were violated when officer "did not intend the bullet to bring plaintiff within his control"

Holding injunctions that broadly order the enjoined party simply to obey the law and not violate the statute are generally impermissible

Holding the "fact that information may be disclosed ‘as required by law’ does not itself defeat all expectations of privacy, nor does it create an expectation that the information will be disclosed automatically whenever it is relevant to a union"

Rejecting "implicit" arguments as insufficient

Rejecting intervenor's “endeavor to achieve disposition of this case on a rationale not set forth by the agency itself”

Holding that an employer violates the NLRA when it fails “to provide information that is needed by the bargaining representative for the proper performance of its duties”

In NLRB v. U.S. Postal Service, 841 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1988), the court suggested that prophylactic measures such as the union's qualification on eligibility for office were supported by "the need to assure the complete devotion of union negotiating teams to employee interests...."

Stating that the Postal Service is "a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by Act of Congress, and supported by the people"