United States Air Conditioning Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cambria Clay Prod

    215 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times

    No. 12072. July 7, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, Thomas R. Haley, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio (J. Mack Swigert, Charles D. Lindberg, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief; Miller, Searl Fitch, Portsmouth, Ohio, of counsel), for respondent. Before McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and GOURLEY, District Judge. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Niles-Bement-Pond

    199 F.2d 713 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 20 times
    Upholding a Board finding that a Christmas bonus paid "over a substantial period of time and in amount . . . based on the respective wages earned by the recipients" were "wages"
  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Kartarik, Inc.

    227 F.2d 190 (8th Cir. 1955)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14958. November 22, 1955. Norton J. Come, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and William J. Avrutis, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Shear, St. Paul, Minn., for respondent. Before JOHNSEN, COLLET and VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judges. JOHNSEN, Circuit

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. J.G. Boswell Co.

    136 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1943)   Cited 29 times
    Finding the fact that an alleged union activity extends outside the employee's own employment is immaterial when determining if the NLRA was violated