§

United Scrap Metal

344 N.L.R.B. 467 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
United Scrap Metal

11 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Be-Lo Stores v. N.L.R.B

    126 F.3d 268 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 21 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board did not properly analyze Gissel in reaching a determination that mandatory bargaining was an appropriate remedy

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Blake Const. Co., Inc.

    663 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that petitioner's exception "to the ALJ's conclusions of law as `based on misstatements of facts, mistaken premises, suppositions, hearsay, and misapplication of law'" sufficiently preserved a due process issue

  7. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"

  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  9. McKenzie Engineering Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    182 F.3d 622 (8th Cir. 1999)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that there was no issue of fact as to whether a specific job was covered under a "Highway and Heavy" provision where the employer deducted union dues pursuant to the CBA and its president made a statement implying that the work was covered by the CBA

  10. America's Best Quality Coatings Corp. v. NLRB

    44 F.3d 516 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 93-4039, 94-1173, and 94-1198. Argued October 4, 1994. Decided January 4, 1995. James R. Scott, Alan M. Levy (argued), Lindner Marsack, Milwaukee, WI, for petitioner. John C. Truesdale, Robert J. Englehart, Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, Deborah E. Shrager (argued), Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Joseph A. Szabo, Director, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, WI, for N.L.R.B. Mary E. Leary (argued), Pittsburgh, PA, Terry Davis, Elizabeth Levie, United

  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 23,457 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice