§

United Rentals, Inc.

08-CA-034853 (N.L.R.B. Jan. 30, 2006)
United Rentals, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  5. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Pinkston-Hollar Const. Services

    954 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 18 times

    No. 90-4483. February 27, 1992. John D. Burgoyne, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Margaret Bezou, Linda Dreehen, for petitioner. David M. Thomas, Neil Martin, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Michael Dunn, Director, Region 23, Ft. Worth, Tex., for other interested parties. Ted B. Kuhn, Buttvill Kuhn, Houston, Tex., for Local 116. Petition for Review of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOHNSON

  8. GSX Corp. of Missouri v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    918 F.2d 1351 (8th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Reviewing board's findings more critically where board's findings are contrary to ALJ's

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Alva Allen Industries, Inc.

    369 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Alva Allen Industries, Inc., 369 F.2d 310, 318 (8th Cir. 1966), the court found no bad faith bargaining where the parties had reached agreement on about 80% of the issues, were apart on wages and union security when the employees struck, and negotiations continued but the employer remained adamant on union security, because "it is only natural that the Company, sensing its strong position, will bargain with increasing toughness and will be less inclined to make concession to the Union."