§

United Rentals Inc.

21-CA-036319 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 29, 2005)
United Rentals Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  4. Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    565 F.2d 1074 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 125 times
    Recognizing that "[t]he substantial evidence standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree"

  5. E.C. Waste, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    359 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2004)   Cited 23 times
    Holding suspicious timing and "myriad violations of § 8" was substantial evidence supporting Board's finding of animus

  6. Holo-Krome Company v. N.L.R.B

    954 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 23 times
    Denying petition for rehearing

  7. Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    632 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 38 times
    Ruling that "[h]ealth care plans are mandatory subjects of bargaining" under the NLRA, and holding that a company's unilateral, material changes to health care benefits violates the Act

  8. Royal Development Co., Ltd. v. N.L.R.B

    703 F.2d 363 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 81-7638, 81-7736. Argued and Submitted August 9, 1982. Decided February 22, 1983. Robert Katz, Jeffrey Harris, Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioner/cross-respondent. William R. Stewart, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. Honorable William J. Jameson, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting

  9. Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22923. September 18, 1969. James N. Adler (argued) Roderick M. Hills, of Munger, Tolles, Hills Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Ronald Wm. Egnor (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Central

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

    705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone