§
United Rentals

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,037 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  4. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  5. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  6. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  8. Hyatt Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    939 F.2d 361 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 100 times
    Upholding Section 8 violations, under Birch Run's general layoff theory, where three union supporters and nine other employees were discharged over a seven month period

  9. Vanguard Fire Supply Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    468 F.3d 952 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 05-2497, 05-2630. Argued: September 20, 2006. Decided and Filed: November 21, 2006. Appeal from the petition for review of final National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). ARGUED: Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner. Stacy G. Zimmerman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Jason J. Valtos, Osborne Law Offices, Washington, D.C., for Intervener. ON BRIEF: Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner. Stacy G. Zimmerman

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Pinkston-Hollar Const. Services

    954 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 18 times

    No. 90-4483. February 27, 1992. John D. Burgoyne, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Margaret Bezou, Linda Dreehen, for petitioner. David M. Thomas, Neil Martin, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Michael Dunn, Director, Region 23, Ft. Worth, Tex., for other interested parties. Ted B. Kuhn, Buttvill Kuhn, Houston, Tex., for Local 116. Petition for Review of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOHNSON