United Parcel Service, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Gomes v. Avco Corp.
964 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir. 1992) Cited 237 times
Holding that an amended complaint adding an act of discrimination that was not in the original complaint did not "relate back"
W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B
70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995) Cited 48 times
Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues
Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B
81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 18 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer
Felix Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
251 F.3d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 6 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Felix, an employee telephoned his supervisor to inquire about additional wages the employer owed him for working night shifts.
N.L.R.B. v. Roswil, Inc.
55 F.3d 382 (8th Cir. 1995) Cited 3 times
No. 94-2929. Submitted January 13, 1995. Decided May 16, 1995. Donald W. Jones, Springfield, MO, argued, for respondent. Margaret Lukes of the NLRB, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LOKEN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and JONES, Senior District Judge. The HONORABLE JOHN BAILEY JONES, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. LOKEN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations
Western Massachusetts Elec. Co. v. N.L.R.B
573 F.2d 101 (1st Cir. 1978) Cited 12 times
Acknowledging that when an employer makes "assertions, the duty to bargain in good faith required [the employer] to provide, upon demand, such information as was reasonably necessary to substantiate them"

United Parcel Service, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Gomes v. Avco Corp.

Holding that an amended complaint adding an act of discrimination that was not in the original complaint did not "relate back"

W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B

Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer

Felix Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

In Felix, an employee telephoned his supervisor to inquire about additional wages the employer owed him for working night shifts.

N.L.R.B. v. Roswil, Inc.

Western Massachusetts Elec. Co. v. N.L.R.B

Acknowledging that when an employer makes "assertions, the duty to bargain in good faith required [the employer] to provide, upon demand, such information as was reasonably necessary to substantiate them"