§

United Parcel Service

327 N.L.R.B. 317 (N.L.R.B. 1998)
United Parcel Service

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Vanguard Tours. Inc.

    981 F.2d 62 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an overbroad rule was unlawful because of the "likely chilling effect of such a rule"

  4. Blue Circle Cement Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    41 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 5 times
    In Blue Circle, we held that an employee's use of the company copy machine to duplicate articles protesting the company's proposed burning of hazardous waste was concerted activity.

  5. Mission Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission

    113 F.3d 254 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times
    Noting that applicant must first determine how much money is required

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Transcon Lines

    599 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 10 times
    Holding the Board's mixed-use designation to be supported by substantial evidence because the drivers' room was an area where employees could relax, drink coffee or eat snacks, and converse freely even though some work was occasionally conducted there

  7. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 13,103 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities