§

United Mine Workers of America, Local 7083

146 N.L.R.B. 176 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
United Mine Workers of America, Local 7083

22 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co.

    312 U.S. 287 (1941)   Cited 382 times
    Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"

  3. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 318 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  4. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  5. Amer. Foundries v. Tri-City Council

    257 U.S. 184 (1921)   Cited 342 times
    Holding that the Clayton Act's provisions on injunctive relief applied to pending cases

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 179 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  7. United Mine Wkrs. of Am. v. Osborne Mining Co.

    279 F.2d 716 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 51 times
    Holding that the question of neutrality is basically a question of fact

  8. United Mine Wkrs. of Am. v. Meadow Creek Coal

    263 F.2d 52 (6th Cir. 1959)   Cited 46 times
    In Meadow Creek, we relied heavily on the Chattanooga Foundry cases in which the courts focused almost exclusively on the nature of the harm inflicted rather than the reasons that the conduct in question was unlawful as reflected in the elements of the cause of action.

  9. International Union, Etc. v. United States

    177 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1949)   Cited 47 times

    Nos. 9943, 9944. Argued March 21, 1949. Decided June 6, 1949. Writ of Certiorari Denied November 7, 1949. See 70 S.Ct. 140. Messrs. Welly K. Hopkins, Washington, D.C., and M.E. Boiarsky, Charleston, W. Va., with whom Messrs. Harrison Combs, Washington, D.C., and T.C. Townsend, Charleston, W. Va., were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Joseph M. Friedman, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. H.G. Morison, Assistant Attorney General, and Messrs. Samuel K. Abrams, Roscoe L. Barrow

  10. Republic Steel Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939)   Cited 59 times
    In Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939), modified on other grounds, 311 U.S. 7, 61 S.Ct. 77, 85 L.Ed. 6 (1940), this court stated that Congress must have contemplated that the protection of the National Labor Relations Act would extend to employees who commit minor acts of misconduct while exercising their right to strike.