§

United Mine Workers of America

191 N.L.R.B. 209 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
United Mine Workers of America

14 Cited authorities

  1. Swift Co. v. United States

    276 U.S. 311 (1928)   Cited 323 times
    Holding that a jurisdictional issue resolved by a consent decree is not open to collateral attack

  2. Labor Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.

    368 U.S. 318 (1961)   Cited 90 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., 368 U.S. 318, 322, 82 S.Ct. 344, 7 L.Ed.2d 312 (1961), the Court considered the appellate court's power to modify Board orders when entering a consent judgment under § 160(e).

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Laney Duke Storage Warehouse Co.

    369 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 59 times
    In Laney Duke, the ALJ had ordered the employer to read the notice to any employee who requested it, but the Board had expanded this to require a reading to all employees, singly or collectively, whether or not requested. The Fifth Circuit denied enforcement because it considered this remedy "unnecessarily embarrassing and humiliating to management rather than effectuating the policies of the Act."

  4. J.P. Stevens Co. v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 44 times
    In J.P. Stevens Co. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d at 304, we enforced an order requiring posting and mailing of notices to employees at forty-three of Stevens' plants in North and South Carolina when flagrant unfair labor practices were found at each of the twenty plants in that region at which union campaigns were started.

  5. Concrete Materials of Georgia, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    440 F.2d 61 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 16 times
    Charging party entitled to an evidentiary hearing on any material issues of disputed fact presented by the objections

  6. Textile Workers of Am., Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 738 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16057. Argued May 26, 1961. Decided July 27, 1961. Mr. Edward Wynne, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Benjamin Wyle, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Marcel

  7. Textile Workers Union of America v. N.L.R.B

    315 F.2d 41 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 16057, 16964. Argued January 17, 1963. Decided January 31, 1963. Mr. Edward Wynne, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Benjamin Wyle, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 16057 and respondent in No. 16964. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 16057. Mr. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Standard Transformer

    202 F.2d 846 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    No. 11647. March 31, 1953. Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Elizabeth W. Weston and Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Eugene Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio), Hoppe, Day Ford, Warren, Ohio (John Q.T. Ford, Warren, Ohio), for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National

  9. National Candy Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

    104 F.2d 999 (7th Cir. 1939)   Cited 20 times
    In National Candy Co. the court merely noted that the federal act's provision for judicial review of an administrative order constituted due process of law.

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. J.L. Hudson Co.

    135 F.2d 380 (6th Cir. 1943)   Cited 16 times

    No. 9379. April 15, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the J.L. Hudson Co. Petition for enforcement of order allowed. Philip G. Phillips, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, David Findling, and John E. Lawyer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Hal H. Smith, of Detroit, Mich. (Hal H. Smith, Archibald Broomfield

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,104 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

  12. Section 554 - Adjudications

    5 U.S.C. § 554   Cited 1,050 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to agencies to "issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty."