§

United Mine E\Workers of America

231 N.L.R.B. 573 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
United Mine E\Workers of America

9 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  5. Teamsters Union v. Oliver

    358 U.S. 283 (1959)   Cited 166 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Teamsters v. Oliver, 358 U.S. 283 (1959), we held that a state antitrust law could not be used to challenge an employer-union agreement. Justice White's opinion in Jewel Tea explains, however, that Oliver held only that "[a]s the agreement did not embody a `"remote and indirect approach to the subject of wages'... but a direct frontal attack upon a problem thought to threaten the maintenance of the basic wage structure established by the collective bargaining contract,' [358 U.S.], at 294, the paramount federal policy of encouraging collective bargaining proscribed application of the state law.

  6. Berkley v. U. S

    416 U.S. 970 (1974)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that "officers are not required to announce at every place of entry" and approving an entry where officers made one announcement at the front door while seconds later other officers entered another

  7. Retail Clerks International Ass'n Local No. 455 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    510 F.2d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 31 times
    Reversing NLRB and upholding an "additional stores" clause, despite the fact that it had not been changed or negotiated for ten years

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Nat. Maritime U. of Am., Afl-Cio

    486 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 24 times
    In NLRB v. National Maritime Union, 486 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 970, 94 S.Ct. 1993, 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974), the Second Circuit found unlawful under section 8(e) of the NLRA a provision in a collective bargaining agreement that required a vessel-owner employer to obtain from any purchaser of a vessel a commitment to comply with the union contract.

  9. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers, International Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    486 F.2d 1266 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 9 times

    No. 72-1277. Argued January 16, 1973. Decided September 28, 1973. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., at the time the brief was filed, was on the brief, for respondent. David M. Heilbron, San Francisco, Cal., with whom William W. Schwarzer, San Francisco, Cal., and Bernard Marcus, New Orleans, La., were on the brief, for intervenors. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board