7 Cited authorities
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 timesIn Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Phœnix Mut. Life Ins.
167 F.2d 983 (7th Cir. 1948) Cited 68 times 1 Legal AnalysesSupporting employees' entitlement to write a letter complaining about supervisor
National Labor Rel. Board v. Baltimore T. Co.
140 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1944) Cited 57 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T. Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 51, the court alluded with apparent approval to the fact that the Board had endeavored to avoid making its sanctions operate retroactively.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. American Steel Buck
227 F.2d 927 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 7 timesNo. 50, Docket 23577. Argued October 13, 1955. Decided December 1, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Elizabeth W. Weston and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Raphael, Searles, Levin Vischi, New York City (Sidney O. Raphael, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before FRANK, HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. As the facts are fully stated in the Board's decision, reported in 110 N.L.R.B. No. 265, we shall not repeat them
National Lab. Rel. B. v. Worcester Woolen Mills
170 F.2d 13 (1st Cir. 1948) Cited 12 timesNo. 4346. October 4, 1948. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against Worcester Woolen Mills Corporation. Order enforced. Louis Libbin, of Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand, and Rose Mary Filipowicz, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Howard W. Cowee, of Worcester, Mass. (Simon G. Friedman, of Worcester, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Standard Transformer
202 F.2d 846 (6th Cir. 1953) Cited 7 timesNo. 11647. March 31, 1953. Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Elizabeth W. Weston and Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Eugene Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio), Hoppe, Day Ford, Warren, Ohio (John Q.T. Ford, Warren, Ohio), for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National
Section 3121 - Definitions
26 U.S.C. § 3121 Cited 694 times 45 Legal AnalysesExcluding state employees