United Gas Pipe Line Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  2. Corrie Corporation of Charleston v. N.L.R.B

    375 F.2d 149 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times
    Finding employer's statement was not protected in light of other circumstances that made statement coercive
  3. Hartsell Mills Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.2d 291 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 41 times

    No. 4592. April 10, 1940. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Hartsell Mills Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition denied; order modified and enforced. Edwin A. Lucas, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Benjamin W. Parham and Parham Taylor, all of Oxford, N.C., and Drinker, Biddle Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Bertram Edises, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C., (Charles

  4. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"