United Elastic Corp.

12 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Columbian Co.
306 U.S. 292 (1939) Cited 994 times
Defining substantial evidence
United States v. White
322 U.S. 694 (1944) Cited 603 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination “is a purely personal one” that “cannot be utilized by or on behalf of any organization, such as a corporation”
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 times
Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.
306 U.S. 332 (1939) Cited 139 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
Eagle Glass Mfg. Co. v. Rowe
245 U.S. 275 (1917) Cited 38 times
APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 23. Submitted December 18, 1916. Decided December 10, 1917. In a suit to restrain alleged concerted wrongful conduct upon the part of officials of a labor union, a temporary injunction should not be granted against those who were not served and did not submit themselves to the jurisdiction. The bill alleged that the answering defendants had constituted other persons named as defendants their agents and representatives
Fife v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
356 Pa. 265 (Pa. 1947) Cited 53 times
October 7, 1946. March 24, 1947. Torts — Conspiracy — Evidence — Simultaneous assertion by persons of same right. 1. Proof of conspiracy must be made by full, clear and satisfactory evidence. [267] 2. The mere fact that two or more persons, each with the right to do a thing, happen to do that thing at the same time is not by itself an actionable conspiracy. [267] Argued October 7, 1946. Before MAXEY, C. J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON, STEARNE and JONES, JJ. Appeals, Nos. 144 to 150, incl., March
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG
118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941) Cited 39 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 118 F.2d 874, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 595, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1549, it was held that an employer's insistence on a provision in a contract with a bargaining agent, that during the period of the contract or at any future time the employees and the union would not request or demand a closed shop agreement or check-off system, warranted the National Labor Relations Board in inferring that the employer was not actuated by a genuine desire to reach an accord with the bargaining representative.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Columbian E. S
96 F.2d 948 (7th Cir. 1938) Cited 8 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Columbian Enameling Stamping Co., 96 F.2d 948, affirmed 306 U.S. 292, 59 S.Ct. 501, 83 L.Ed. 660, we refused enforcement of an order to reinstate certain discharged striking employees on the ground that their strike was in violation of a no-strike clause in a contract with Columbian.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Highland Shoe, Inc.
119 F.2d 218 (1st Cir. 1941) Cited 3 times
No. 3625. April 15, 1941. Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board directed to Highland Shoe, Inc. Order directed to be enforced. Edward Schneider, Regional Atty., of Boston, Mass. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel Edes and Walter B. Wilbur, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for the Board
Tannenbaum v. Hofbauer
142 Misc. 120 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1931) Cited 2 times
September 26, 1931. Harry L. Kreeger and William Roth, for the plaintiff. William Karlin, for the defendants. SHIENTAG, J. Motion to set aside the dismissal of the complaint ordered by the trial court at the close of plaintiff's case. This is an action to recover damages for an assault and battery alleged to have been committed upon the plaintiff by nine unidentified men acting under the order of Powers, a business agent of the defendant union. The plaintiff's evidence establishes for the purposes

United Elastic Corp.

12 Cited authorities

Defining substantial evidence

Holding that Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination “is a purely personal one” that “cannot be utilized by or on behalf of any organization, such as a corporation”

Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

In N.L.R.B. v. Columbian Enameling Stamping Co., 96 F.2d 948, affirmed 306 U.S. 292, 59 S.Ct. 501, 83 L.Ed. 660, we refused enforcement of an order to reinstate certain discharged striking employees on the ground that their strike was in violation of a no-strike clause in a contract with Columbian.