§

United Chrome Products, Inc. And United Saw Service

288 N.L.R.B. 1176 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
United Chrome Products, Inc. And United Saw Service

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Bakery Workers

    430 U.S. 243 (1977)   Cited 531 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration clause survived the expiration of the CBA, even though the agreement was silent as to survival

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  4. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  5. Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers v. C.R.S.T

    795 F.2d 1400 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 42 times
    Holding that an employer's past refusal to arbitrate grievances under unilaterally instituted terms and conditions of employment as well as its implementation of a new grievance procedure limited to only one specific type of dispute manifested an objective intent by the employer not to be bound by the expired agreement's arbitration provision

  6. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    829 F.2d 458 (3d Cir. 1987)   Cited 9 times

    No. 86-3641. Argued June 19, 1987. Decided September 25, 1987. David Silberman, Laurence Gold (argued), Michael R. Fanning, Intern. Union of Operating Engineers, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Montalbano (argued), David Solomon, Schneider, Cohen, Solomon, Leder and Montalbano, Jersey City, N.J. (Michael H. Gottesman, Robert M. Weinberg, David A. Sklansky, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Robert E. Allen, Victoria A. Higman (argued), Elliott Moore, Rosemary M. Collyer, N.L.R.B., Washington

  7. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions