3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal AnalysesAffirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd. v. U. Ass'n of Journeymen
242 F.2d 722 (3d Cir. 1957) Cited 14 timesNo. 11888. Argued January 10, 1957. Decided March 27, 1957. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis H. Wilderman, Paula R. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondents. Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. HASTIE, Circuit Judge. A controversy
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Duval Jewelry Co.
243 F.2d 427 (5th Cir. 1957) Cited 4 timesNo. 16180. April 2, 1957. On Motion for Modification May 6, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Maurice Alexandre, Norton J. Come, Attys. N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Lloyd R. Fraker, Ch. Law Officer, 10th Reg. N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Theo. Hamilton, Jacksonville, Fla., Hamilton Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellees. Before RIVES, TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board