§

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America

81 N.L.R.B. 802 (N.L.R.B. 1949)
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America

38 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,296 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Thornhill v. Alabama

    310 U.S. 88 (1940)   Cited 1,704 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights

  3. U.S. v. Amer. Trucking Ass'ns

    310 U.S. 534 (1940)   Cited 1,677 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"

  4. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,499 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

  5. Thomas v. Collins

    323 U.S. 516 (1945)   Cited 886 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"

  6. Wickard v. Filburn

    317 U.S. 111 (1942)   Cited 924 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "even if appellee’s activity be local and though it may not be regarded as commerce, it may still, whatever its nature, be reached by Congress if it exerts a substantial effect on interstate commerce"

  7. Caminetti v. United States

    242 U.S. 470 (1917)   Cited 1,916 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that importation of a woman for immoral purposes may constitutionally be regulated even when it is not for material gain

  8. Gompers v. Bucks Stove Range Co.

    221 U.S. 418 (1911)   Cited 1,558 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding criminal contempt does not “undo or remedy what has been done, nor afford any compensation for the pecuniary injury caused by the disobedience”

  9. Mandeville Farms v. Sugar Co.

    334 U.S. 219 (1948)   Cited 391 times
    Holding that sugar beet growers had stated a valid monopsony claim under the Sherman Act even though they did not allege end-user impact

  10. Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co.

    312 U.S. 287 (1941)   Cited 382 times
    Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"

  11. Section 104 - Enumeration of specific acts not subject to restraining orders or injunctions

    29 U.S.C. § 104   Cited 580 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting injunctions of labor speech unless "involving fraud or violence"